首页

当前位置: 首页 > 品牌活动 > 学术报告 > 正文 学术报告

“商学大讲堂”系列学术讲座(第204讲)---学术名家讲坛(28)

来源:商学院   韩晓东     发布时间: 2023-05-04    点击量:

讲座题目:Advertising Format and Content Provision on Revenue-Sharing Content Platforms

主讲嘉宾:田林

讲座时间:202357日(星期日)下午1330—1530

讲座地点:商学院116东方厅


欢迎感兴趣的师生前来聆听!


江南大学商学院

202354

主讲嘉宾简介

田林,复旦大学管理学院管理科学系教授/博士生导师。研究领域为面向平台供应链的运营决策问题,涉及电商平台、共享平台、在线服务平台等。研究成果发表在JMRMKSCMSMSOMORPOM、《管理科学学报》等国际与国内知名期刊。主持国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目,同时主持或参与可口可乐(上海)、华为技术有限公司、华住集团、中国东方航空等多个企业项目。获第八届教育部人文社科青年成果奖,担任POMSenior EditorDecision SciencesAssociate Editor、以及《系统管理学报》的领域编委。学术源于实践,学术应服务于实践,希望自己可以成为学术与实践之间联系的一根丝线。

讲座主要内容

The digital content market has grown dramatically in recent years. Many platforms show ads when consumers watch the content on their platforms, and they share ad revenue with content creators to incentivize them to create and share content. These platforms generally adopt either a uniform-advertising format or a differentiated-advertising format. This paper shows that, regardless of the ad format, an increase in substitubility of content creators on the platform can increase the content creators’ profits and the consumer surplus. By contrast, an increase in substitubility of content creators can benefit the platform under uniform advertising but not under differentiated advertising. Moreover, the equilibrium ad revenue-sharing rate, content quality, and the number of ads shown for each content will be lower under differentiated advertising than under uniform advertising. The platform’s profit and the consumer surplus are also lower under differentiated advertising than under uniform advertising. However, depending on the substitubility of content creators, the content creators’ profits can be higher or lower under differentiated advertising. In an extension, we also analyze an emerging ad format in which the platform allows content creators themselves to decide the number of ads on their content. Interestingly, we show that this new ad format can make all the market participants (i.e., the platform, the content creators, and the consumers) worse off.